Responsiveness Report Example

See the kind of clarity a First Touch Metrics report provides.

This example shows the type of operational findings businesses receive after a responsiveness test across real customer inquiry channels.

Responsiveness Report

Northside Plumbing & Drain

In actual client engagements, First Touch Metrics inquiries are performed by real people—not bots or automated inquiry systems—to reflect how prospective customers actually reach out.

Reporting period: April 18 – April 24

Summary

At a glance

This section provides a high-level overview of how inquiries were handled during the test period.

Response Rate
50%
2 of 4 inquiries received a response
Inquiries Tested
4
Phone, web form, and email
No Response
2
2 inquiries received no reply
Within Expected Time
25%
1 of 4 inquiries responded on time

Key Findings

What stood out most

Phone inquiries were handled quickly and consistently.

Web form inquiries did not receive responses during the test period.

Email inquiries received a response, but slower than expected.

Response Speed

How quickly responses were received

Median First Response Time
9h 32m
Average First Response Time
9h 32m

Channel Performance

How each channel performed

ChannelResponse RateMedian First Response Time% Within 15 Minutes
Phone1/1 responded (100%)4 minutes100%
Web Form0/2 responded (0%)——
Email1/1 responded (100%)19 hours0%

Expected Timing

Are responses arriving within expected time?

Within Expected Time
25%
1 of 4 inquiries
Responded Late
25%
1 of 4 inquiries
No Response
50%
2 of 4 inquiries

This section compares tested inquiries against expected response timing standards for each channel.

Response Time Overview

How responses are distributed

Responded inquiries were split between very fast response and delayed response in this example.
Under 5 Minutes
1 inquiries (50%)
5 to 15 Minutes
0 inquiries (0%)
15 to 60 Minutes
0 inquiries (0%)
1 to 4 Hours
0 inquiries (0%)
Over 4 Hours
1 inquiries (50%)

This section shows how first response times are distributed across inquiries that received a response.

No Response

Inquiries that received no response

2 tested inquiries were classified as no response during this reporting period.

InquiryDate StartedChannelOutcome
#2Mon, 1:47 PMWeb FormNo response during test period
#4Thu, 11:03 AMWeb FormNo response during test period

Responded Late

Inquiries that received a late response

1 tested inquiry was classified as responded late during this reporting period.

InquiryDate StartedChannelFirst Response Time
#3Tue, 10:08 AMEmail19 hours

What ongoing monitoring can reveal

A single test provides a snapshot. Continued testing can reveal recurring blind spots, confirm whether corrective actions are working, and identify new response problems when they appear.

The hypothetical example below illustrates how a business might use six months of ongoing testing to improve its response reliability.

Response Reliability Over Time

Hypothetical six-month example — not actual customer results

Response Reliability Over TimeHypothetical response reliability at the initial free test and six monthly testing periods. Exact figures are in the table below. Lines connect testing periods; intermediate values were not measured.0%25%50%75%100%50%Initial62.5%M162.5%M275%M362.5%M475%M587.5%M6

Initial = initial free test; M1–M6 = Months 1–6. Lines connect testing periods only; intermediate values were not measured.

  • Month 2: Web-form routing issue identified
  • Month 4: Email slowdown detected
Hypothetical testing results. Response Reliability = responses received ÷ (responses received + finalized No Response).
PeriodResponses receivedResponse ReliabilityWithin expected timeNo ResponseMedian first response
Initial free test2 of 450%1 of 429h 32m
Month 15 of 862.5%3 of 832h 48m
Month 25 of 862.5%4 of 832h 05m
Month 36 of 875%5 of 821h 12m
Month 45 of 862.5%3 of 832h 10m
Month 56 of 875%5 of 8254m
Month 67 of 887.5%6 of 8132m

A recurring blind spot was confirmed.

Web-form inquiries were the principal weakness during the initial test and first two months. Repeated testing showed that the first missed submissions were not merely an isolated incident.

A corrective action produced measurable improvement.

After the hypothetical business corrected its form-routing process, web-form reliability improved and median first response time declined.

Continued monitoring detected a new setback.

Email performance slipped during Month 4. Because testing continued, the change was identified before it became a longer-term pattern.

The business made meaningful progress—with room to improve.

By Month 6, seven of eight tested inquiries received a response, and six were answered within the expected time. Performance was substantially stronger than the initial test, but continued monitoring could still help identify and address the remaining gaps.

Your business will have its own story.

First Touch Metrics tests what prospective customers actually experience when they contact your business. The results may confirm that your response process is working well—or reveal blind spots that deserve attention.

Start with a free test and see what happens when a prospective customer reaches out.

Get a free test of your business

See how your business responds to real customer inquiries across phone, web forms, email, text, and other contact channels.

Request Your Free Test